Jman wrote:I am going to do something so crazy, that I have some hope it might work.
I can see where you're all coming from if you choose not to agree with me while I really hope you do. This is more of a personal thing, but it makes sense if you really think about it.
Round 1: I was a common villager. So much logical evidence stating I was a wolf was presented against me that being lynched was inevitable, as I would've been convinced myself, had I not known my own role. The villagers obviously, as predicted, voted for me, which I understand 110%, which led to my death, instead of the wolf I was accusing, who indeed ended up being a lynched and identified as wolf the very next day. The villagers lost in a sense because of my death, and while everyone thinks going off of random tangents is bad, but this is much different than the random pointings in Day 1. I felt the whole time like I had so much evidence against LSP(Not this round I'm talking about Round 1), but I just couldn't present it and think of a way to persuade everyone.
Now based on that, let's look at Zed's situation here. Snail provided so much damn evidence against him that any smart person would probably not think twice, similar to what Elmo did to me, for which I applaud you Snail. I can also see myself how the things Zed's done looked incredibly wolfish, but so did I. It's called mistakes. I mean this by the fact our main reason(at least I think main reason) on lynching zed is that he called himself and his scry out on day one in a public IRC channel with ~7 people in it. He didn't mean to do this, and I believe him. Look at Alphadecay, saying how he's defending himself like a wolf would do. That same exact arguement was placed against me last round and it is a valid arguement, and in mine, and presumably Zed's case it's not.
We have to look at the standings right now, with 3 villagers dead, and all 6 wolves alive. This means that there's 7 villagers left. If Zed dies and he's a villager, we'll lose and it'll be over and done with. Thus, I cannot be responsible for pulling the same thing done to me last round, causing the wolves to win.
What I'm trying to say is that based on the "evidence" (more like abstract reasoning) above, we must lynch one of my previous and current prime suspects, WowzerAnne. Snail and a few others, and I were planning to lynch her after Zed died, to my knowledge. What I'm saying is when Zed dies, there will be no tomorrow. Please take this into strong consideration and trust me when I say lynching Zed is not the answer. While I do understand there's a slight chance my reasoning on WowzerAnne is flawed, meaning that she may be a villager, it would be much better knowing there's a higher chance of WowzerAnne being a wolf than Zed.
PS: Thanks for reading this and if you have any specific questions on anything PM me and I'll try to clarify, but if you're going to help me pull this off we have to do it before nightfall, or else the game ends and villagers lose.
I understand why you might want to defend Zed, because you feel that he is being railroaded just like you were in round one. However, in this round, we simply dont have any other person who has so much evidence against them. But if you kill Wowzeranne (who has less evidence of being a wolf stacked against her anyway) and she turns out to be a villager, the wolves also win. So you're argument is invalid. Out of Wowzeranne and Zed, Zed is being lynched simply because he has a higher chance (at least in the public eye) of being a wolf than anyone else, which is what we're supposed to do as villagers anyways.
